两种体外分离成人骨髓间充质干细胞方法的比较★
杨 芬,杨乃龙
Comparison between two isolation methods of human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro
Abstract
AIM:There is no standard isolation method of mesenchymal stem cells. Percoll density gradient centrifugation is treated as the traditional method among numerous methods but it is so complicated. This study compares whole bone marrow culture to traditional Percoll density gradient centrifugation in order to establish a better method in vitro.
METHODS: Experiments were conducted at Central Laboratory of Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Medical College from September 2006 to June 2007. Bone marrow was supported by patients who had autologous stem cell transplantation by endocrinology department for diabetes treatment. The experiments had known by the patients and authorized by the hospital ethic committee. The two different methods, whole bone marrow culture and Percoll density gradient centrifugation, were compared in the number of cell clone, cell morphology, cell superficial mark, the differentiation into fat cell.
RESULTS: ① The number of clone cell by whole bone marrow culture was more than by Percoll density gradient centrifugation(P < 0.05). There was no remarkable differentiation of morphological expression about mesenchymal stem cells using the two methods. They were both like long shuttle, clone growth. ②Immunofluorescence showed that positive CD44 expression and negative CD34 expression in the third generation of mesenchymal stem cells cultured by the whole bone marrow method was less than by Percoll density gradient centrifugation (t =2.639,P < 0.01). ③The third generation of mesenchymal stem cells gotten by the two methods could differentiate into fat cell by insulin and dexamethasone.
CONCLUSION:Compared with the Percoll density gradient centrifugation method, whole bone marrow method with advantages of rapid adherence, operated simply and high gain ratio is better isolation method of mesenchymal stem cells.
Yang F, Yang NL.Comparison between two isolation methods of human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yanjiu yu Linchuang Kangfu 2008;12(3):473-476(China)
[www.zglckf.com/zglckf/ejournal/upfiles/08-3/3k-473(ps).pdf]
Department of Endocrinology, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China
Yang Fen★, Studying for master's degree, Attending physician, Department of Endocrinology, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China
qdyangfen2005@
126.com
Correspondence to:Yang Nai-long, Professor, Chief physician, Department of Endocrinology, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China
Received:2007-09-03
Accepted:2007-10-26
摘要
目的:目前尚缺乏标准的骨髓间充质干细胞分离方法,虽然Percoll密度梯度离心法被认为是较经典的方法,但该方法操作较复杂。比较全骨髓培养法与常用的Percoll密度梯度离心法分离成人骨髓间充质干细胞的差异,以寻找一种简便、经济、实用的人骨髓间充质干细胞体外分离方法。
方法:实验于2006-09/2007-06在青岛大学医学院附属医院中心实验室完成。实验材料:行自体干细胞移植治疗的糖尿病患者骨髓由青岛大学医学院附属医院内分泌科提供,患者对实验知情同意,并经医院伦理委员会批准。实验方法:采用全骨髓培养法与Percoll密度梯度离心法从成人骨髓中分离骨髓间充质干细胞,比较两种方法所获得的贴壁细胞克隆数、细胞形态、细胞表面标志及向脂肪细胞的分化情况。
结果:①全骨髓培养法获得的贴壁细胞克隆数明显多于Percoll密度梯度离心法(P < 0.05)。两种方法获得的人骨髓间充质干细胞形态无明显差异,均为长梭形,克隆样生长。②免疫荧光显示,全骨髓培养法分离培养的第3代骨髓间充质干细胞 CD44阳性表达率和CD34 阴性表达率均略低于Percoll密度梯度离心法, 但两者之间的差异无统计学意义(t =2.639,P < 0.01)。③两种方法获得的第3代骨髓间充质干细胞经地塞米松、胰岛素诱导后均可分化脂肪细胞。
结论:与传统的Percoll密度梯度离心法比较, 全骨髓培养法获得的骨髓间充质干细胞贴壁较快,传代时间略早,细胞数量多。
关键词:成人骨髓间充质干细胞;种子细胞;细胞培养
杨芬,杨乃龙.两种体外分离成人骨髓间充质干细胞方法的比较[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2008,12(3):473-476
[www.zglckf.com/zglckf/ejournal/upfiles/08-3/k-473(ps).pdf]
青岛大学医学院内分泌科, 山东省青岛市
266003
杨 芬★,女,1966年生,河南省安阳市人,汉族,青岛大学医学院在读硕士,主治医师,主要从事骨髓干细胞诱导分化为胰岛素分泌细胞的研究。
qdyangfen2005@
126.com
通讯作者:杨乃龙,教授,主任医师,青岛大学医学院内分泌科,山东省青岛市
266003
中图分类号: R394.2
文献标识码: A
文章编号: 1673-8225
(2008)03-00473-04
收稿日期: 2007-09-03
修回日期:2007-10-26
(07-50-9-4822/GW Q)
课题背景:
课题为院重点课题,由院资金资助,研究目的在于为临床糖尿病等疾病的干细胞移植治疗提供理论依据,现已成功地在体外分离培养出成人骨髓干细胞并诱导分化为神经细胞、脂肪细胞和胰岛素分泌细胞。
应用要点:虽有报道说全骨髓培养法由于造血谱系细胞的影响很难得到比较纯的骨髓间充质干细胞,但本实验用全骨髓培养法分离的骨髓间充质干细胞,用含10%血清的低糖DMEM培养定期换液和传代后,发现分离出的骨髓间充质干细胞,虽然原代形态不如Percoll密度梯度离心法得到的细胞形态一致性好、纯度较低,但传二三代后纯度增高,与Percoll密度梯度离心法并无明显差异。
相关链接:骨髓间充质干细胞较其他来源的干细胞相比有取材方便、机体损伤小、易于临床操作等优点,可在体外多次传代扩增并保持定向分化能力,可根据拟移植部位的细胞类型及细胞结构,在体外定向诱导分化为与其相似的细胞群体后再移植。因此是临床组织工程中干细胞治疗的理想种子细胞。
|
Advertisement |
 |
|