周刊 1997年1月创刊(总第312期) 第12卷 第4期 2008年1月22日出版

轴向控制动力性锁钉的生物力学特性*★

王 军1,彭新生2,王国栋1,潘 滔1


Biomechanical characteristics of axial controlled dynamic intramedullary nail

Abstract

AIM
Interlocking intramedullary nail is commonly used in the internal fixation of fractures of long tubular bones. Its static feature may induce the mechanical failure of materials, and result in complications. This article describes the design and explores the biomechanical properties of axial controlled dynamic intramedullary nail.

METHODS: Experiments were conducted in the Biomechanical Laboratory of Southern Medical University from October to December 2006. ①Self-made axial controlled dynamic intramedullary nail was composed of a lock nail and a intramedullary nail. Two axial controlled panels with 60° angle were added at the proximal end of the intramedullary nail. The obverse side of the axial controlled panels was ladder-shaped, with the oblique angle of 10°, 0.8 mm in thick, 8 mm in height. ②Eight pair specimens of adult tibias were made into A1 type fracture models according to OTA with a wire saw. Axial controlled dynamic intramedullary nail and Grosse & Kempf nail were implanted into the tibias in MTS858 machine. Torsional, bending and axial compressive tests were made on the specimens. The axial and bending loading was 700 N and 300 N, respectively, and the test velocity was 0.1 mm/s; the torsional moment was 4 Nm and the test velocity was 0.3 (°)/s.

RESULTS: Axial controlled dynamic intramedullary nail produced a significantly lower strain than the Grosse & Kempf nail (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in torsional stiffness, and bending stiffness of coronal and sagittal plane between the axial controlled dynamic intramedullary nail and the Grosse & Kempf nail (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The axial controlled dynamic intramedullary nail has the similar torsional and bending stiffness comparable with the Grosse & Kempf nail, and the biomechanical properties of axial controlled dynamic intramedullary nail in resistance to compression are significantly better than that of Grosse & Kempf nail. Axial controlled dynamic intramedullary nail is an effective and convenient implant to treat tibial fracture.

Wang J, Peng XS, Wang GD, Pan T.Biomechanical characteristics of the axial controlled dynamic intramedullary nail. Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yanjiu yu Linchuang Kangfu 2008;12(4):623-626(China)
[www.zglckf.com/zglckf/ejournal/upfiles/08-4/4k-623(ps).pdf]

1Department of Orthopaedics, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, Guangdong Province, China; 2Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China

Wang Jun★, Studying for master's degree, Department of Orthopaedics, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, Guangdong Province, China
Wangjunjunwang88@126.com

Correspondence to: Pan Tao, Doctor, Associate chief physician, Tutor of master, Department of Orthopaedics, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, Guangdong Province, China
ptao001@163.com

Supported by: the Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province, No. 2003c1030104*

Received:2007-09-01
Accepted:2007-10-27


目的:交锁髓内钉是目前国内外应用于长管状骨骨折内固定的主流,但其静力性固定特性将有可能导致材料的力学失败,引起相关并发症,基于此,设计了轴向控制动力性锁钉并进行生物力学测试。
方法:实验于2006-10/12在南方医科大学生物力学实验室完成。①自制轴向控制动力性锁钉的结构:由锁钉和髓内钉组成,髓内钉的近端增加了2个夹角为60°轴向控制板,轴向控制板正面为梯形,斜角为10°,厚0.8 mm,高度为8 mm。②轴向控制动力性锁钉与交锁钉生物力学比较:将8对新鲜尸胫骨标本用线锯在胫骨中段制成OTA分类A1型骨折模型,分别用胫骨轴向控制动力性锁钉与交锁钉固定,安装在MTS858实验机上,进行抗压缩、弯曲及扭转测试分析,施加的轴向负荷为700 N,测试速度0.1 mm/s;弯曲负荷为300 N,速度0.1 mm/s,扭矩4 Nm,速度0.3 (°)/s。
结果:轴向控制动力性锁钉压缩应变值明显小于交锁钉组,差异有非常显著性意义(P < 0.01),轴向控制动力性锁钉抗的扭转刚度、冠状面和矢状面弯曲刚度与交锁钉组比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
结论:轴向控制动力性锁钉在抗弯曲和抗扭转方面能达到或接近交锁钉的强度,在抗压缩方面强于交锁钉。说明轴向控制动力性锁钉能起到动力性固定的作用,具有良好的生物力学性能,是治疗胫骨骨折的一种可供选择的新型髓内固定器械,能够满足临床需要。
关键词:胫骨;骨折;内固定;生物力学

王军,彭新生,王国栋,潘滔.轴向控制动力性锁钉的生物力学特性[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2008,12(4):623-626
[www.zglckf.com/zglckf/ejournal/upfiles/08-4/4k-623(ps).pdf]

1中山大学附属第六医院骨科,广东省广州市 510655;2中山大学附属第一医院骨科,广东省广州市 510080

王 军★,男,1981年生,山东省临沂市人,汉族,中山大学在读硕士,主要从事关节外科与创伤骨科研究。
Wangjunjunwang
88@126.com

通讯作者:潘 滔,博士,副主任医师,硕士生导师,中山大学附属第六医院骨科,广东省广州市 510655 ptao001@163.com

广东省科技计划项目(2003c1030104)*

中图分类号: R318
文献标识码: A
文章编号: 1673-8225
(2008)04-00623-04

收稿日期:2007-09-01
修回日期:2007-10-27
(07-50-9-4806/N·Q)

课题背景:实验属于中山大学附属第一医院骨科参与承担的广东省科技计划项目(2003c1030104)中的一部分,课题为“骨折轴向控制动力性内固定系统的研制开发与应用”。实验的选题是基于目前静力性固定装置存在很多的不足与术后并发症,想通过设计一种动力性髓内固定装置,在保持静力性固定装置优点的同时能改进其不足,并通过本实验来展示其生物力学特性。进一步的实验还将用有限元分析的方法对本装置进行更深入的探讨。
相关链接:一直以来,骨折内固定遵循着解剖复位、坚强固定的AO原则,交锁髓内钉作为长管状骨骨折内固定的“金标准”,就是在AO原则下出现的经典的内固定装置。 但是,交锁髓内钉作为静力性固定有因为应力遮挡或集中引起的锁钉及主钉断裂、再骨折等并发症。20世纪90年代初AO学者Gerber等相继提出了生物学固定(BO)原则。本实验中的轴向控制动力性锁钉就是在BO原则的指导下设计来减少术后并发症及促进骨愈合。
同行评价:对腰椎间盘突出症的治疗可以采用多种方法。腰椎间盘切除加脊柱融合和人工髓核置换是其中重要的两种手术治疗方法。对这两种方法进行临床比较具有一定科学意义。

Advertisement

《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》杂志社
地址:沈阳1200邮政信箱 邮编:110004 传真:+86 24 23394178